TkRat: Sort per folder?

[Stefan Richter]

Derek B. Noonburg wrote:
> On 21 Feb, Don Lewis wrote:
>> I'm using it.  I use natural sort order for my large, high volume
>> folders to avoid the delays imposed by the other sort orders, and to
>> make it easier to find the new messages.
> 
> I'm also using it.  I prefer natural order for most folders, but mailing
> list messages get sorted (by procmail) into a couple folders, and I use
> threaded sort for those.

I used to use it too. But nowadays I end up needing threaded order (thus
a bit less performant than natural order) on the folders with highest
volume anyway, so this feature is not very important to me at the moment.

Furthermore, I switched to the CVS version of TkRat just recently and am
only beginning to become used to the filtering feature. I think I might
go back to natural order for large "storage" folders (combined with
filtering for access to relevant subjects or senders). Perhaps I would
then use natural order as the fastest* one as the default on all folders...

*) fastest from the technical POV, not fastest from the usability POV
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=-= --=- =-==-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/